<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1034 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the confiscation of imported goods, redemption fine, and penalty imposition. The appellant successfully argued that the goods were legitimately ordered as re-rollable scrap, supported by export documents and origin certificate. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of expert opinion in verifying the goods&#039; nature and set aside the penalties imposed, highlighting the importance of expert opinion in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:14:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1034 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the confiscation of imported goods, redemption fine, and penalty imposition. The appellant successfully argued that the goods were legitimately ordered as re-rollable scrap, supported by export documents and origin certificate. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of expert opinion in verifying the goods&#039; nature and set aside the penalties imposed, highlighting the importance of expert opinion in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>