https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190413 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license. It found the revocation unjustifiable as the appellant had followed prescribed procedures, and no violations were found in transactions with Customs. The significant delay in the revocation process was noted, but the focus was on the lack of merit in the order. Non-compliance with CBLR, 2013 time-limits rendered the impugned order unsustainable, leading to the decision to overturn the revocation of the license. en-us Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:14:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190413 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license. It found the revocation unjustifiable as the appellant had followed prescribed procedures, and no violations were found in transactions with Customs. The significant delay in the revocation process was noted, but the focus was on the lack of merit in the order. Non-compliance with CBLR, 2013 time-limits rendered the impugned order unsustainable, leading to the decision to overturn the revocation of the license. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190413