<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1189 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the appellants complied with Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and could utilize the credit on molasses for the clearance of denatured spirit. The reversal of proportional credit was considered adequate, and penalties imposed were not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:14:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1189 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the appellants complied with Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and could utilize the credit on molasses for the clearance of denatured spirit. The reversal of proportional credit was considered adequate, and penalties imposed were not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>