<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 573 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190402</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of expenses u/s.40(a)(ia) for the assessment year 2008-09. The ITAT held that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) is prospective in nature and applies from the year of the amendment, following the decision in the case of Virgin Creators.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:13:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 573 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190402</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of expenses u/s.40(a)(ia) for the assessment year 2008-09. The ITAT held that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) is prospective in nature and applies from the year of the amendment, following the decision in the case of Virgin Creators.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>