https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190401 The Supreme Court held that the principles established in the ECIL case apply even when statutory rules require furnishing the enquiry report. Despite the respondent being dismissed without receiving the report as mandated by statutory rules, the court found no prejudice demonstrated by the respondent. Therefore, the dismissal order was upheld, overturning the decisions of the Tribunal and High Court that had quashed the dismissal. The importance of procedural compliance and substantial compliance was emphasized, with the court highlighting that actual prejudice must be shown in cases of procedural lapses. en-us Wed, 02 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190401 The Supreme Court held that the principles established in the ECIL case apply even when statutory rules require furnishing the enquiry report. Despite the respondent being dismissed without receiving the report as mandated by statutory rules, the court found no prejudice demonstrated by the respondent. Therefore, the dismissal order was upheld, overturning the decisions of the Tribunal and High Court that had quashed the dismissal. The importance of procedural compliance and substantial compliance was emphasized, with the court highlighting that actual prejudice must be shown in cases of procedural lapses. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190401