https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190398 The Supreme Court held that the contravention of Section 33(2)(b) does not render the dismissal void but illegal. The Labour Court's orders for wage payment were treated as compensation. Workmen were advised to seek remedies under Section 33A or Section 10. The appeals were allowed, and costs were to be paid by the appellant. C.A. No. 2820 of 1977 was disposed of based on judgments in Civil Appeals Nos. 1375 and 1384 of 1977, setting aside the Labour Court's order due to the workman's lack of entitlement under Section 33C(2) without prior adjudication. en-us Tue, 21 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:28:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190398 The Supreme Court held that the contravention of Section 33(2)(b) does not render the dismissal void but illegal. The Labour Court's orders for wage payment were treated as compensation. Workmen were advised to seek remedies under Section 33A or Section 10. The appeals were allowed, and costs were to be paid by the appellant. C.A. No. 2820 of 1977 was disposed of based on judgments in Civil Appeals Nos. 1375 and 1384 of 1977, setting aside the Labour Court's order due to the workman's lack of entitlement under Section 33C(2) without prior adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190398