https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190396 The appeal was dismissed. The Court held that Section 25F(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not constitute a condition precedent for valid retrenchment. The appropriate Government's refusal to refer the dispute to the Tribunal under Section 12(5) of the Act was deemed legal, as the Government has the discretion to consider the merits of the dispute before making a reference. Section 25F(c) was interpreted as a provision intended to inform the Government about retrenchment, rather than being a condition precedent to protect the workman's interests. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:12:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190396 The appeal was dismissed. The Court held that Section 25F(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not constitute a condition precedent for valid retrenchment. The appropriate Government's refusal to refer the dispute to the Tribunal under Section 12(5) of the Act was deemed legal, as the Government has the discretion to consider the merits of the dispute before making a reference. Section 25F(c) was interpreted as a provision intended to inform the Government about retrenchment, rather than being a condition precedent to protect the workman's interests. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190396