<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment Order u/s 144C Challenged for Procedural Flaw, Not Jurisdictional Error, Due to Missing DRP Directions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33284</link>
    <description>Validity of assessment order pursuant to order u/s 144C - there is no direction given by the ld. DRP to ld. Assessing Officer but the directions were only given to the ld. TPO. This has in our opinion resulted in a procedural defect and not a jurisdictional error that could invalidate the proceedings in toto. It is only a curable defect - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:48:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Order u/s 144C Challenged for Procedural Flaw, Not Jurisdictional Error, Due to Missing DRP Directions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33284</link>
      <description>Validity of assessment order pursuant to order u/s 144C - there is no direction given by the ld. DRP to ld. Assessing Officer but the directions were only given to the ld. TPO. This has in our opinion resulted in a procedural defect and not a jurisdictional error that could invalidate the proceedings in toto. It is only a curable defect - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:48:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>