<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 594 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338894</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition made on account of AMP expenditure and instructing the AO to examine the claim for unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for compliance with the DRP&#039;s directions and appropriate benchmarking methods, highlighting the absence of an international transaction in the AMP expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:48:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 594 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338894</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition made on account of AMP expenditure and instructing the AO to examine the claim for unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for compliance with the DRP&#039;s directions and appropriate benchmarking methods, highlighting the absence of an international transaction in the AMP expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>