<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 592 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338892</link>
    <description>The ITAT confirmed the disallowance of Rs. 45.90 lakhs but allowed the deduction of Rs. 99.10 lakhs for the cost of improvement in calculating Long Term Capital Gain, to prevent double taxation. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the Assessee&#039;s claim for a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC for investment in infrastructure bonds, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:48:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 592 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338892</link>
      <description>The ITAT confirmed the disallowance of Rs. 45.90 lakhs but allowed the deduction of Rs. 99.10 lakhs for the cost of improvement in calculating Long Term Capital Gain, to prevent double taxation. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the Assessee&#039;s claim for a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC for investment in infrastructure bonds, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>