<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 589 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Long-Term Capital Loss (LTCL) incurred through Portfolio Management Services should be treated as capital gains, not business income, reversing the lower authorities&#039; decision. However, the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was upheld. The appeals for both assessment years were partly allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee on the LTCL treatment but against them on the disallowance issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 589 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Long-Term Capital Loss (LTCL) incurred through Portfolio Management Services should be treated as capital gains, not business income, reversing the lower authorities&#039; decision. However, the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was upheld. The appeals for both assessment years were partly allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee on the LTCL treatment but against them on the disallowance issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>