https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338885 The Tribunal found that the procedural defect in the case, where the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) issued directions to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) instead of the Assessing Officer, was curable. The DRP's order was set aside, and the case was remitted back for proper directions in accordance with the law. The appeal of the assessee was treated as allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:48:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338885 The Tribunal found that the procedural defect in the case, where the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) issued directions to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) instead of the Assessing Officer, was curable. The DRP's order was set aside, and the case was remitted back for proper directions in accordance with the law. The appeal of the assessee was treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338885