<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 581 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338881</link>
    <description>The case involved the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of additions made to the income of the assessee on account of gifts under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating evidence to invoke Section 153C. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:48:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 581 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338881</link>
      <description>The case involved the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of additions made to the income of the assessee on account of gifts under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating evidence to invoke Section 153C. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>