<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 579 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338879</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Court held that the inadvertent submission of Form No.15J to the wrong authority did not justify the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. It was noted that the error did not invalidate the submission, and the exemption from tax deduction based on the sub-contractors&#039; circumstances was upheld. The judgment emphasized the application of Section 292B and relevant precedents in supporting the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:48:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 579 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338879</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Court held that the inadvertent submission of Form No.15J to the wrong authority did not justify the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. It was noted that the error did not invalidate the submission, and the exemption from tax deduction based on the sub-contractors&#039; circumstances was upheld. The judgment emphasized the application of Section 292B and relevant precedents in supporting the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>