https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338874 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the impugned order rejecting the refund claim under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant was granted the refund for the remaining amount sought, totaling Rs. 21,62,961 for the period October 2012 to December 2012. The Tribunal considered the nexus between input and output services, previous decisions in the appellant's favor, and the granting of refunds for similar services by the adjudicating authority. The appeal was allowed with any necessary consequential reliefs. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:47:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338874 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the impugned order rejecting the refund claim under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant was granted the refund for the remaining amount sought, totaling Rs. 21,62,961 for the period October 2012 to December 2012. The Tribunal considered the nexus between input and output services, previous decisions in the appellant's favor, and the granting of refunds for similar services by the adjudicating authority. The appeal was allowed with any necessary consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338874