<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 568 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338868</link>
    <description>Marginal shortage of inputs was not sustained as a recoverable demand where the shortage was examined against the actual barrel weight and the assessee&#039;s earlier reversal with interest already covered the discrepancy, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. Penalties on the directors were sustained because the records reflected acknowledged irregularities. The company&#039;s penalty under Rule 173Q was set aside because the notice and order did not specify the precise clause allegedly contravened, and a penal provision with distinct clauses requires clear identification of the exact breach before penalty can be imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 568 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338868</link>
      <description>Marginal shortage of inputs was not sustained as a recoverable demand where the shortage was examined against the actual barrel weight and the assessee&#039;s earlier reversal with interest already covered the discrepancy, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. Penalties on the directors were sustained because the records reflected acknowledged irregularities. The company&#039;s penalty under Rule 173Q was set aside because the notice and order did not specify the precise clause allegedly contravened, and a penal provision with distinct clauses requires clear identification of the exact breach before penalty can be imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>