<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 562 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338862</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;any person&quot; in Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act is of wide import and extends to a borrower, guarantor, or any other aggrieved person. The court fee rules must be read as a whole: the specific fee entries for applications or appeals by a borrower or by an aggrieved person other than the borrower govern substantive challenges to measures under Sections 17 and 18, while the residuary entry for &quot;any other application by any person&quot; is confined to matters outside that core challenge framework. A third-party appellant filing a Section 18 appeal against dismissal of a SARFAESI application was therefore required to pay the prescribed appeal fee, and the direction to pay the deficit court fee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 562 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338862</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;any person&quot; in Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act is of wide import and extends to a borrower, guarantor, or any other aggrieved person. The court fee rules must be read as a whole: the specific fee entries for applications or appeals by a borrower or by an aggrieved person other than the borrower govern substantive challenges to measures under Sections 17 and 18, while the residuary entry for &quot;any other application by any person&quot; is confined to matters outside that core challenge framework. A third-party appellant filing a Section 18 appeal against dismissal of a SARFAESI application was therefore required to pay the prescribed appeal fee, and the direction to pay the deficit court fee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>