<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1639 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the appellant in a case involving the conversion of a free shipping bill to a DEPB scheme shipping bill. Despite a clerical error in the initial filing, the appellant provided sufficient documentary evidence to establish eligibility for DEPB benefit. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory right to seek document amendments under Section 149 of the Customs Act and cited previous judgments where similar conversion requests were allowed. The rejection of the conversion request was deemed unjustified, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:46:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1639 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the appellant in a case involving the conversion of a free shipping bill to a DEPB scheme shipping bill. Despite a clerical error in the initial filing, the appellant provided sufficient documentary evidence to establish eligibility for DEPB benefit. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory right to seek document amendments under Section 149 of the Customs Act and cited previous judgments where similar conversion requests were allowed. The rejection of the conversion request was deemed unjustified, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>