<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1033 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190387</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order of the revisional authority, and declared the petitioner entitled to the rebate as per Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The judgment ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that exporters are entitled to both kinds of rebates under Rule 18.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:46:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1033 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190387</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order of the revisional authority, and declared the petitioner entitled to the rebate as per Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The judgment ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that exporters are entitled to both kinds of rebates under Rule 18.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>