<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1186 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190388</link>
    <description>Printed posters, hoardings, banners and similar publicity materials are not covered by Entry No. 71 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The entry, read as a whole, applies to printed materials of the kind ordinarily used as stationery or for individual reading use, and the words in the entry take colour from one another. Public display advertising materials differ in character, use and medium of printing, and a wider reading would improperly make other tariff entries redundant. The commercial understanding of such goods also does not support their inclusion within the entry, so the lower-rate classification was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1186 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190388</link>
      <description>Printed posters, hoardings, banners and similar publicity materials are not covered by Entry No. 71 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The entry, read as a whole, applies to printed materials of the kind ordinarily used as stationery or for individual reading use, and the words in the entry take colour from one another. Public display advertising materials differ in character, use and medium of printing, and a wider reading would improperly make other tariff entries redundant. The commercial understanding of such goods also does not support their inclusion within the entry, so the lower-rate classification was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>