<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1031 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, concluding that the addition of Rs. 27,53,150 to the returned income was not entirely justified. It confirmed the addition of Rs. 7,75,000 due to lack of evidence for certain loans but allowed relief of Rs. 19,78,150 (Rs. 11,25,000 from verified loans and Rs. 8,53,150 from past savings and property sales). The order was pronounced on February 25, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1031 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, concluding that the addition of Rs. 27,53,150 to the returned income was not entirely justified. It confirmed the addition of Rs. 7,75,000 due to lack of evidence for certain loans but allowed relief of Rs. 19,78,150 (Rs. 11,25,000 from verified loans and Rs. 8,53,150 from past savings and property sales). The order was pronounced on February 25, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>