https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190354 Retrospective application of amended rent-control provisions to pending suits and appeals was upheld because the classification between owner-landlords and transferee-landlords had an intelligible differentia linked to tenant protection and prevention of speculative transfers. The Court treated the extension of the three-year embargo as a reasonable restriction in the public interest and found no violation of Articles 14 or 19(1)(f). It also adopted a validating construction for pending proceedings, permitting fresh pleadings on amended grounds where necessary so the statute could operate effectively without needless multiplication of litigation. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:18:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190354 Retrospective application of amended rent-control provisions to pending suits and appeals was upheld because the classification between owner-landlords and transferee-landlords had an intelligible differentia linked to tenant protection and prevention of speculative transfers. The Court treated the extension of the three-year embargo as a reasonable restriction in the public interest and found no violation of Articles 14 or 19(1)(f). It also adopted a validating construction for pending proceedings, permitting fresh pleadings on amended grounds where necessary so the statute could operate effectively without needless multiplication of litigation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190354