https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190350 Service rendered on ad hoc, daily wage, urgent temporary or work-charged basis was not treated as service in the cadre for claiming selection grade, stagnation benefits, promotion-linked benefits or seniority. The governing rules distinguished regular appointment to the service from temporary engagement outside the recruitment process, and only regular cadre service counted as qualifying service for such benefits. Executive instructions could not override statutory recruitment rules, and earlier dismissal of special leave petitions did not create binding precedent or negative equality. The cited precedents were consistent that non-regular service is excluded when reckoning length of service for these benefits. en-us Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:37:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190350 Service rendered on ad hoc, daily wage, urgent temporary or work-charged basis was not treated as service in the cadre for claiming selection grade, stagnation benefits, promotion-linked benefits or seniority. The governing rules distinguished regular appointment to the service from temporary engagement outside the recruitment process, and only regular cadre service counted as qualifying service for such benefits. Executive instructions could not override statutory recruitment rules, and earlier dismissal of special leave petitions did not create binding precedent or negative equality. The cited precedents were consistent that non-regular service is excluded when reckoning length of service for these benefits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190350