https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190344 The Revision Application succeeded, setting aside the impugned Order-in-Appeal and restoring the Order-in-Original. The exporter-respondents incorrectly claimed drawback under Rule 6 despite applicable rates under Rule 3. Supplementary claims were rejected as time-barred, with the Government holding that Rule 17 did not apply for condonation of delay. The Department's proceedings for recovery of excess paid drawback were upheld by the Commissioner of Customs, Pune. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:36:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190344 The Revision Application succeeded, setting aside the impugned Order-in-Appeal and restoring the Order-in-Original. The exporter-respondents incorrectly claimed drawback under Rule 6 despite applicable rates under Rule 3. Supplementary claims were rejected as time-barred, with the Government holding that Rule 17 did not apply for condonation of delay. The Department's proceedings for recovery of excess paid drawback were upheld by the Commissioner of Customs, Pune. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190344