<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions on all three grounds. The decisions were based on established legal precedents and the requirement for the AO to record specific satisfaction before making disallowances under Section 14A. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to prescribed methods and judicial principles in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions on all three grounds. The decisions were based on established legal precedents and the requirement for the AO to record specific satisfaction before making disallowances under Section 14A. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to prescribed methods and judicial principles in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>