<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 552 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338852</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating evidence to invoke powers under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act. The judgment clarified the legal interpretation of the provisions and highlighted the importance of evidence in such cases. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation was correct and that the substantial questions of law raised did not apply to the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 552 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338852</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating evidence to invoke powers under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act. The judgment clarified the legal interpretation of the provisions and highlighted the importance of evidence in such cases. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation was correct and that the substantial questions of law raised did not apply to the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>