<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (2) TMI 9 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6763</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, citing the doctrine of constructive res judicata. The petitioner was barred from challenging the order of committal to civil prison on new grounds, having already raised the issue in previous proceedings. The court emphasized the importance of judicial finality and public policy, dismissing the petition with costs. The liability of the karta of a Hindu undivided family under Rule 73 was left unresolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (2) TMI 9 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6763</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, citing the doctrine of constructive res judicata. The petitioner was barred from challenging the order of committal to civil prison on new grounds, having already raised the issue in previous proceedings. The court emphasized the importance of judicial finality and public policy, dismissing the petition with costs. The liability of the karta of a Hindu undivided family under Rule 73 was left unresolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>