<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 536 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338836</link>
    <description>Services obtained after issuance of letters of intent for mining operations, including preparation of mining plans, environmental clearances, hydro studies and rainwater harvesting, were treated as input services under the Cenvat rules because they were undertaken to satisfy conditions attached to the intended mining lease and were integrally connected with future use of limestone in manufacturing. Although the full mining lease had not yet been granted when credit was taken, the services were held to be sufficiently linked to the assessee&#039;s business activity. Cenvat credit on the disputed services was therefore admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 536 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338836</link>
      <description>Services obtained after issuance of letters of intent for mining operations, including preparation of mining plans, environmental clearances, hydro studies and rainwater harvesting, were treated as input services under the Cenvat rules because they were undertaken to satisfy conditions attached to the intended mining lease and were integrally connected with future use of limestone in manufacturing. Although the full mining lease had not yet been granted when credit was taken, the services were held to be sufficiently linked to the assessee&#039;s business activity. Cenvat credit on the disputed services was therefore admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>