https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190329 The Tribunal clarified that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat credit pre-2007, as Rule 9(2) amendments did not apply retrospectively. The denial of credit based on Rule 11(7) findings was upheld, and the Commissioner (A)'s extension to Rule 11(7) was deemed invalid. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:57:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190329 The Tribunal clarified that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat credit pre-2007, as Rule 9(2) amendments did not apply retrospectively. The denial of credit based on Rule 11(7) findings was upheld, and the Commissioner (A)'s extension to Rule 11(7) was deemed invalid. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190329