<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1315 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190323</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC considered whether an acquittal could stand on the grounds of absence of valid sanction for prosecution and lack of territorial jurisdiction. It held that the acquittal could not be sustained and set it aside, remanding the matter to the Trial Court for a fresh decision after hearing both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1315 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190323</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC considered whether an acquittal could stand on the grounds of absence of valid sanction for prosecution and lack of territorial jurisdiction. It held that the acquittal could not be sustained and set it aside, remanding the matter to the Trial Court for a fresh decision after hearing both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>