<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2613 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190333</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the Order-in-Appeal confirming the demand of duty and interest on lost molasses due to a storage tank burst. The penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was reinstated as the applicant failed to account for the duty on the lost molasses, leading to the violation of specific provisions. The revision applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2613 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190333</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the Order-in-Appeal confirming the demand of duty and interest on lost molasses due to a storage tank burst. The penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was reinstated as the applicant failed to account for the duty on the lost molasses, leading to the violation of specific provisions. The revision applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>