https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190320 Proceedings arising from seizure of exported goods under the Customs Act were brought before the Magistrate under the Code of Criminal Procedure, where the trial court had discharged the accused and dropped the case. The High Court found no error in that approach, noting that there were no reasons to continue prosecution against the accused persons and that splitting up the case would serve no useful purpose. The request to revive and continue the proceedings by splitting up the case was therefore rejected. en-us Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:03:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190320 Proceedings arising from seizure of exported goods under the Customs Act were brought before the Magistrate under the Code of Criminal Procedure, where the trial court had discharged the accused and dropped the case. The High Court found no error in that approach, noting that there were no reasons to continue prosecution against the accused persons and that splitting up the case would serve no useful purpose. The request to revive and continue the proceedings by splitting up the case was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190320