<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 624 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190313</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad High Court&#039;s orders regarding toll collection on Shashtri Bridge, dismissing the Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) filed by the petitioner. The court emphasized public policy against re-challenging withdrawn petitions and stressed the importance of adhering to legal principles to maintain judicial integrity. The petitioner was directed to refund the extra amount collected due to enhanced toll rates and to pay the recalculated bid money with interest to the government treasury.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:43:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 624 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190313</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad High Court&#039;s orders regarding toll collection on Shashtri Bridge, dismissing the Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) filed by the petitioner. The court emphasized public policy against re-challenging withdrawn petitions and stressed the importance of adhering to legal principles to maintain judicial integrity. The petitioner was directed to refund the extra amount collected due to enhanced toll rates and to pay the recalculated bid money with interest to the government treasury.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>