<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 515 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of commission payments to ACPL and IMACO for the Assessee, a German civil engineering company, for fiscal years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The Tribunal found that the Assessee had provided sufficient evidence of services rendered by ACPL and IMACO, and rejected the AO&#039;s conclusions of the transactions being sham or bogus. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of local support for foreign companies and upheld the principle that revenue authorities should not question the reasonableness of business expenditures. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the deletion of the disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:47:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 515 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of commission payments to ACPL and IMACO for the Assessee, a German civil engineering company, for fiscal years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The Tribunal found that the Assessee had provided sufficient evidence of services rendered by ACPL and IMACO, and rejected the AO&#039;s conclusions of the transactions being sham or bogus. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of local support for foreign companies and upheld the principle that revenue authorities should not question the reasonableness of business expenditures. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the deletion of the disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>