<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 514 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338814</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act could not be sustained due to defective show cause notices that did not specify the exact charge. As a result, the penalties were canceled, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, while the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:47:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 514 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338814</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act could not be sustained due to defective show cause notices that did not specify the exact charge. As a result, the penalties were canceled, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, while the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>