<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 508 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338808</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the invalidity of the assessment due to flawed notice service and lack of substantial evidence supporting the addition of unexplained investment. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper notice procedures and the necessity for reliable evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 508 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338808</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the invalidity of the assessment due to flawed notice service and lack of substantial evidence supporting the addition of unexplained investment. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper notice procedures and the necessity for reliable evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>