<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 507 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338807</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to set aside the AO&#039;s rejection of the books of account and the estimation of the GP rate. However, the ITAT disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s lump sum addition of Rs. 1 crore and deleted it. As a result, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal of the revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:47:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 507 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338807</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to set aside the AO&#039;s rejection of the books of account and the estimation of the GP rate. However, the ITAT disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s lump sum addition of Rs. 1 crore and deleted it. As a result, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal of the revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>