<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 491 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the equal amount of penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, allowing the appellant to pay a reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax demand. The confirmation of service tax and interest was upheld. However, the penalty under section 70 was maintained, with the appellant directed to pay the balance of Rs. 6,000 for delayed returns. The appeal was partly allowed with specified modifications and consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 491 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the equal amount of penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, allowing the appellant to pay a reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax demand. The confirmation of service tax and interest was upheld. However, the penalty under section 70 was maintained, with the appellant directed to pay the balance of Rs. 6,000 for delayed returns. The appeal was partly allowed with specified modifications and consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>