<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 490 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the service provided by the appellant as Works Contract Service, not Erection, Commissioning &amp;amp; Installation Service, setting aside the Service Tax demand. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The decision was based on the interpretation of legal provisions and the nature of services in constructing petrol pumps, following precedents supporting the classification due to the use of materials in execution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 490 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the service provided by the appellant as Works Contract Service, not Erection, Commissioning &amp;amp; Installation Service, setting aside the Service Tax demand. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The decision was based on the interpretation of legal provisions and the nature of services in constructing petrol pumps, following precedents supporting the classification due to the use of materials in execution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>