<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 484 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Denso India Ltd. and set aside the proposal for recovery of denied Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 7,31,366. The Tribunal found no suppression of fact or deficiency in information submitted in the ER-1 returns, aligning with a ruling by the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Allahabad. Consequently, the findings in the Order-in-Appeal denying the credit were overturned, and the appellant was entitled to any consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 484 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Denso India Ltd. and set aside the proposal for recovery of denied Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 7,31,366. The Tribunal found no suppression of fact or deficiency in information submitted in the ER-1 returns, aligning with a ruling by the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Allahabad. Consequently, the findings in the Order-in-Appeal denying the credit were overturned, and the appellant was entitled to any consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>