https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338773 The court upheld the original interim order, rejecting the modification application based on subsequent changes in case law. Emphasizing the importance of maintaining judicial orders, the court ruled that unless there is a significant change in circumstances, modification is unwarranted. The appellant's delay in seeking modification and failure to challenge the original order earlier were noted. The court deemed the appeal frivolous, imposing a cost of Rs. 20,000 on the appellant for wasting public time. Failure to deposit the cost within two weeks would result in appropriate action, with a related application disposed of in line with the appeal's dismissal. en-us Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338773 The court upheld the original interim order, rejecting the modification application based on subsequent changes in case law. Emphasizing the importance of maintaining judicial orders, the court ruled that unless there is a significant change in circumstances, modification is unwarranted. The appellant's delay in seeking modification and failure to challenge the original order earlier were noted. The court deemed the appeal frivolous, imposing a cost of Rs. 20,000 on the appellant for wasting public time. Failure to deposit the cost within two weeks would result in appropriate action, with a related application disposed of in line with the appeal's dismissal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338773