<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 468 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338768</link>
    <description>Piston rings made of iron and steel were treated as falling within the declared goods entry for &quot;discs, rings, forgings and steel castings&quot; under Section 14(iv)(viii) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Court applied a practical and commercial construction, holding that an item integral to the enumerated class should not be narrowly pushed into the residuary category. It also relied on the assessee&#039;s earlier treatment of the product and on common-parlance reasoning approved in Dewan Enterprises. The result was that the goods were not taxable as a residuary item under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 468 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338768</link>
      <description>Piston rings made of iron and steel were treated as falling within the declared goods entry for &quot;discs, rings, forgings and steel castings&quot; under Section 14(iv)(viii) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Court applied a practical and commercial construction, holding that an item integral to the enumerated class should not be narrowly pushed into the residuary category. It also relied on the assessee&#039;s earlier treatment of the product and on common-parlance reasoning approved in Dewan Enterprises. The result was that the goods were not taxable as a residuary item under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>