<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 467 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338767</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was declined where the investigation material prima facie showed creation of fake firms using forged documents, procurement of VAT registration on false papers, and diversion of transactions to claim tax credit. The Court relied on statements of the persons in whose names the firms were shown and the co-accused to find prima facie involvement in criminal breach of trust, cheating, misappropriation and forgery under the Indian Penal Code, together with offences under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The contention that only VAT-related contraventions were made out was rejected, and discretion was not exercised in favour of the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 467 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338767</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was declined where the investigation material prima facie showed creation of fake firms using forged documents, procurement of VAT registration on false papers, and diversion of transactions to claim tax credit. The Court relied on statements of the persons in whose names the firms were shown and the co-accused to find prima facie involvement in criminal breach of trust, cheating, misappropriation and forgery under the Indian Penal Code, together with offences under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The contention that only VAT-related contraventions were made out was rejected, and discretion was not exercised in favour of the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>