<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 466 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338766</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to release the detained goods upon payment of a one-time tax, allowing the petitioner to challenge the tax imposition or compounding fee in the future. The writ petition was disposed of, with the connected pending application closed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:38:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 466 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338766</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to release the detained goods upon payment of a one-time tax, allowing the petitioner to challenge the tax imposition or compounding fee in the future. The writ petition was disposed of, with the connected pending application closed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>