<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1246 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a steel bar manufacturer denied credit on inputs due to issues with a non-existent supplier and locked dealer premises. Despite lower authorities demanding duty, interest, and penalties, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to credit as there was no obligation to verify the supplier&#039;s existence before procurement without credible evidence of non-receipt. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:37:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1246 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a steel bar manufacturer denied credit on inputs due to issues with a non-existent supplier and locked dealer premises. Despite lower authorities demanding duty, interest, and penalties, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to credit as there was no obligation to verify the supplier&#039;s existence before procurement without credible evidence of non-receipt. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>