<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1638 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190303</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee regarding the disallowance of Lab Test Expense under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the interpretation of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia), the confirmation of payment by the payee, and consistency with prior judgments like CIT v. Ansal Landmark Township (P.) Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:37:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1638 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190303</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee regarding the disallowance of Lab Test Expense under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the interpretation of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia), the confirmation of payment by the payee, and consistency with prior judgments like CIT v. Ansal Landmark Township (P.) Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>