<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 851 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190284</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the detention order and confirmation order due to the non-placement of retraction letters before the detaining authority. The reliance on confessional statements without considering retractions vitiated the detention order, rendering it invalid and illegal. The detenu was ordered to be released unless required to be detained in accordance with the law in another case/order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:20:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 851 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190284</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the detention order and confirmation order due to the non-placement of retraction letters before the detaining authority. The reliance on confessional statements without considering retractions vitiated the detention order, rendering it invalid and illegal. The detenu was ordered to be released unless required to be detained in accordance with the law in another case/order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>