<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 851 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190284</link>
    <description>Detention under COFEPOSA was held vitiated because the detaining authority was not supplied with the detenu&#039;s retraction letter and the bail application referring to that retraction. The confessional statements under Section 108 of the Customs Act formed the substantial basis of the detention and confirmation orders, so the retraction material was vital to assess voluntariness and reliability. As the detention grounds were treated as a composite whole centred on those statements, the omission could not be cured by severability or by indirect references elsewhere in the record. The challenge therefore succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:20:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 851 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190284</link>
      <description>Detention under COFEPOSA was held vitiated because the detaining authority was not supplied with the detenu&#039;s retraction letter and the bail application referring to that retraction. The confessional statements under Section 108 of the Customs Act formed the substantial basis of the detention and confirmation orders, so the retraction material was vital to assess voluntariness and reliability. As the detention grounds were treated as a composite whole centred on those statements, the omission could not be cured by severability or by indirect references elsewhere in the record. The challenge therefore succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>