https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190278 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order for re-trial of the appellants. The Court emphasized that revisional jurisdiction should only be exercised in exceptional cases to prevent gross miscarriage of justice, and interference with an order of acquittal should be minimal unless there is a manifest illegality or grave injustice. The Supreme Court concluded that the High Court's interference in this case was not justified, as there was no legal infirmity or procedural error in the trial court's judgment. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:56:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190278 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order for re-trial of the appellants. The Court emphasized that revisional jurisdiction should only be exercised in exceptional cases to prevent gross miscarriage of justice, and interference with an order of acquittal should be minimal unless there is a manifest illegality or grave injustice. The Supreme Court concluded that the High Court's interference in this case was not justified, as there was no legal infirmity or procedural error in the trial court's judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190278