<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 355 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190271</link>
    <description>For compensation under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the best evidence of market value is a bona fide sale of similar land at or about the Section 4 notification. A sale instance proved by an agreement to sell and sale deed may be relied on even if it is post-notification, if it is reasonably proximate and there is no proof of speculative or abnormal price rise. Where the comparable land adjoins the purchaser&#039;s land or acquisition-related factors may have affected price, appropriate deductions are required. The SC treated the proved sale as the proper valuation guide, while rejecting other instances as distress sales or unreliable comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:33:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 355 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190271</link>
      <description>For compensation under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the best evidence of market value is a bona fide sale of similar land at or about the Section 4 notification. A sale instance proved by an agreement to sell and sale deed may be relied on even if it is post-notification, if it is reasonably proximate and there is no proof of speculative or abnormal price rise. Where the comparable land adjoins the purchaser&#039;s land or acquisition-related factors may have affected price, appropriate deductions are required. The SC treated the proved sale as the proper valuation guide, while rejecting other instances as distress sales or unreliable comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>