<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 462 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338762</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the entire addition of Rs. 1,22,94,128 and Rs. 87,47,333. The expenses in question were found to be specifically related to the Dahej Project in India and not general administrative overheads. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the provisions of section 44C was deemed correct, leading to the dismissal of the appeals in favor of the assessee and against the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:28:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 462 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338762</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the entire addition of Rs. 1,22,94,128 and Rs. 87,47,333. The expenses in question were found to be specifically related to the Dahej Project in India and not general administrative overheads. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the provisions of section 44C was deemed correct, leading to the dismissal of the appeals in favor of the assessee and against the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>